CO129-589-19 Evacuation- refusals 3-6-1941 - 2-8-1941 — Page 11

#.

seems the least objectionable course, but it will be necessary to consult the War Office since the G.C.C. is opposed to it, and I attach a draft to Col. Scott.

WBh 7mm.

18.7.41.

Mrs

N

As an altêmative to the two course discussed above it might be possible to take action against Black and the others in group 6 of my minite and it

time to attempt to meet the poles peeling discrimination .e.g. by enforcing the wacuation

5 and 6 (and groups

3) and by

the

Jame

agenmot of those

newwwing the cases

Janebly

groups 2 and 4. I doubt howwer

if his would lead to any in promment of feeling among

the husbands

so long

an

women are

any

lefon

rearum d.e. nurses, AR? personnel cli

the Colony for defence there would be charges of discrimination

wwes have gone

If monning бретит

from Thure whose

and illogical though it may be

The disgrunted husbands would probably

di

side agamit the Government if they came entrosted

controversy over enforcing evenate on the hitherto succesful recalcitrants.

in

The whole squattle

is

distasteful and

and may

he

resolves in the near future by Japan's "Southward

Жобича

March

4

Ловило

48/7

We must follow the Gor; adver about this, hat must concult the

w-o puit. M. Mant. 19

121.217/41

link-19 why

17 0 —

8 To St-Col FC Scott inlopy 12, 3, 6, 6, 47

2:17

23.7.41